AI & ML
Communication-Efficient Private Federated Reinforcement Learning with Post-Quantum Authentication for Vehicular Networks
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.41055v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated reinforcement learning supports cooperative vehicular routing without centralizing trajectory data, but model updates may reveal private information and incur communication overhead over intermittent vehicle-to-infrastructure links, particularly when post-quantum authentication is required. We study correlated private quantization, using complementary shared randomness between paired vehicles to reduce aggregation mean squared error while preserving the marginal parameter-level local differential privacy and one-bit communication cost of independent quantization. A tunable extension mixes shared and independent randomness to bound privacy leakage given paired outputs and shared-randomness side information. For this extension, R\'enyi differential privacy accounting establishes vector-level local differential privacy for one model upload even when pairings are revealed. Under matched vector-level privacy and identical local and global parameters, the extension yields 16.5% lower analytical aggregation mean squared error than independent quantization. We evaluate cooperative routing by coupling traffic simulation with packet-level simulation of post-quantum-authenticated vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. Compared to full-precision updates, one-bit uploads reduce authenticated uplink size by 92.4% and increase mean verified updates aggregated per round from 19.6 to 26.5. Under mobility-constrained communication at a parameter-level privacy budget of 1, correlated private quantization reduces mean travel time by 14.3% relative to independent quantization at the same budget and communication cost. At a parameter-level privacy budget of 0.3, a vehicle-origin inference attack trained on independent simulations reaches 30% accuracy with correlated private quantization and 22% with independent quantization after 100 rounds, versus 91% without privacy and 10% for random guessing.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41055PreviousCharacterizing Recoverable Expert-Utilization Signatures in Fine-Tuned Mixture-of-Experts LLMsNextLanG 2.0: Energy-Efficient Agentic AI for Semi-Automated Security Operations at Scale
Related posts

Use it, or lose it 🧠
0dev.to AI

AI Daily Digest November 3, 2026: OpenAI Wires Agents into ServiceNow, Australia Books a 40,000-GPU AI Factory
0dev.to AI
How Publishers Can Test Engagement Signals to Improve On-Site Discovery
0dev.to AI
What Meta's Muse actually reads: first data from 3 tiny businesses
0dev.to WebDev
Your AI apps should answer to you, not to their lab
0dev.to Security

Warp's Breach Reached Agent Decision Logs. What One Agent Trace Actually Contains
0dev.to Security