AI & ML
Consensus-Constrained Dual-Federated Optimization with Client-Side Dynamic Weighting for Distributed Android Device Threat Defense
arXiv cs.DC0 views
arXiv:2611.09470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Smartphones, smart-home hubs, and wearables are increasingly exposed to sophisticated Android malware, while centralized threat-detection pipelines raise privacy and scalability concerns. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without collecting raw client data, but partial participation and variation in local model quality can destabilize global optimization. In this article, we propose DW-FedADMM, a federated optimization framework that combines primal-dual coordination with performance-dependent client-side weighting. The dynamic coefficient modulates each participating client's local state before the augmented-Lagrangian update, while the dual variables regulate disagreement between local and global model states. We evaluate DW-FedADMM on three Android malware benchmarks, namely Drebin, Malgenome, and TUANDROMD, with 5, 10, and 15 clients holding IID data shards, partial client participation, and communication budgets of 5 and 10 rounds. Each configuration is repeated with ten random seeds. DW-FedADMM obtains the highest seed-averaged accuracy on Drebin (97.64% +/- 0.20%) and the best mean accuracy in 9 of the 18 dataset-client-round configurations, including 7 of the 9 configurations with a 10-round budget. Pooled over all configurations, it reaches 95.42% accuracy, 94.62% F1-score, 96.06% precision, and 99.45% AUC, compared with 95.32%, 94.51%, 95.56%, and 99.41% for FedADMM, while also giving the lowest mean false-positive rate and the smallest client update norm among the six compared methods. Both primal-dual methods are well ahead of the averaging- and proximal-based baselines on Malgenome and TUANDROMD, where the latter often remain at the majority-class solution when clients are fragmented. The gain of dynamic weighting over FedADMM is most pronounced on Drebin and with the longer communication budget, where it also reduces the variation across seeds.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09470PreviousMINE: Entropy-coded Memory-efficient Inference for Large Language ModelsNextTPIC: Energy-Conserving Space Plasma Simulations on GPU Supercomputers
Related posts
The climate case for AI has not been made
0MIT Technology Review
I Let Pangram Loose on My Gmail Inbox. Here’s How Much AI It Found
0Wired
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.24: Advanced Autonomous Behaviors [KR]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fgmggiae4nyxpukfvgqba.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.24: Advanced Autonomous Behaviors [KR]
0dev.to
화면이 사람을 붙잡는 힘 — AB 1709 소송이 개발자에게 던지는 질문
0dev.to
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.12: Reversing and Parking [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F1k9m20qhwzb1csyeu5v1.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.12: Reversing and Parking [EN]
0dev.to
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.13: Docking and Charging [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ff66zllmrqlif2vsyczxb.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.13: Docking and Charging [EN]
0dev.to