AI & ML
Cross-Embodiment Motion Planning by Coupling Body-Agnostic World Model with Differentiable Ego-Dynamics
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2610.41330v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Motion planning in clutter is embodiment-specific: the feasible free space and reachable commands depend on each robot's geometry and dynamics. Existing cross-embodiment policies output normalized commands that disregard these differences, or compensate through per-robot training and distillation. World models can in principle pool cross-embodiment data, yet command-conditioned models bind their latent dynamics to a single action space, while pose-conditioned models omit the mapping from commands to body-specific motion. On flat ground, however, embodiment affects the planner's observations only through the camera ego-motion. This letter proposes Hourglass, an hourglass-shaped architecture that factorizes cross-embodiment motion planning at this interface: a body-agnostic world model and each robot's differentiable ego-dynamics, which map commands to that ego-motion, are coupled only through it. The world model is trained on data pooled across embodiments and camera mounts; each robot's ego-dynamics is a reduced-order template with identified physical parameters. A generalist parameter-conditioned policy is learned once at this junction: each imagined step rolls out the template and then the world model, and imagination training through each robot's template makes the policy body-aware. On seven simulated robots of five locomotion types, the generalist policy outperforms imitation-learning and diffusion-policy baselines on the same world model by 3.8--10.6 percentage points in success rate and matches per-robot specialists without dedicated training, while approaching its parameter-conditioned MPPI teacher within 1.4--2.8 points without an online map. After three minutes of teleoperated driving for identification, the synthetic-data-trained model transfers zero-shot to a real skid-steer robot unseen in training, navigating unseen indoor scenes.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41330PreviousLearning from Physical Experience:Context-Space Adaptation for Robotic ManipulationNextHIPC: Humanoid Iterative Planning and Control via Goal-Conditioned Motion Closure
Related posts
US Government Email Systems Open to Abuse Thanks to Typos
0Dark Reading

Ukraine takes bold step toward satellite independence following Starlink disruption — partnering with European makers to launch its own sovereign orbital mesh
0TechRadar

CleanMyMac now helps you clean up Gmail and manage Chrome tabs
09to5Mac

Report: Apple captured half of global smartphone revenue in Q3
09to5Mac

Google Find Hub rolls out ‘Notify when left behind’ tracker alerts on Android
09to5Google

Salon is shutting down after 31 years
0The Verge