AI & ML
A Layered Simplex Architecture for Large Alphabets
arXiv math.IT0 views
arXiv:2608.19908v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A learning architecture induces a prior over its expressible models. Recent work links architectural success to a broad complexity spectrum: model probabilities spanning many orders of magnitude. Understanding how depth shapes these priors and prediction may help explain the success of neural networks and transformers. We study this connection in large-alphabet prediction through the *layered simplex architecture* (LSA), which multiplies independent uniform simplex vectors coordinate-wise and normalizes. At depth zero, the prior is concentrated on the uniform distribution; at depth one, the Bayesian predictor is Laplace's rule. Each additional layer shifts prior mass toward more concentrated distributions. We derive exact Bayesian marginal likelihood and regret expressions using reusable depth-specific kernels. Mixing over depths up to a cutoff logarithmic in alphabet size yields an explicit predictor with rigorous guarantees. For targets uniform on a specified sparse support, the mixture's prior complexity is asymptotic to the support-description cost at every fixed positive KL resolution, establishing a broad complexity spectrum. We also prove a regret lower bound for every label-invariant predictor: the expected description length of the discovered symbol set minus the source's uncertainty about its identity given its size. For Zipf sources in a growing-alphabet regime, the depth mixture attains this bound to leading order. Thus, the symbol-discovery rate determines the regret exponent. Although introduced to study depth, the LSA predictor competes with established large-alphabet methods, including Good--Turing, Ristad's law and an adaptive Dirichlet mixture, while substantially outperforming classical add-constant rules on concentrated sources.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19908PreviousDomain-Adaptive Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding for Image ClassificationNextSmart Approvals in Amazon Quick: Human oversight where it matters
Related posts
Hugging Face’s CEO Says His P(Doom) Is ‘Close to Zero’
0Wired
Knives Are Out in the White House
0Wired
Open source AI is booming. Hugging Face explains who profits.
0TechCrunch
From disclosure to durable protection: lessons from CVE-2026-113341
0dev.to
Do AI crawlers read llms.txt? What three days of server logs show
0dev.to

About $50 per breach: inside the AI-agent campaigns that probed 1,200+ websites
0dev.to News