AI & ML
Fast Sampling or High Gain? iP versus PI Control
arXiv cs.SY0 views
arXiv:2611.13153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Intelligent proportional (iP) controllers, introduced in the framework of model-free control, are often presented as an alternative to proportional-integral (PI) controllers that requires no model of the plant. This paper studies this property for a first-order linear plant under sampled-data implementation with a zero-order hold. When the time derivative of the output is estimated by a backward difference, the discrete-time iP and PI controllers are known to obey the same control law under a one-to-one correspondence between their parameters. Building on this correspondence, the paper derives necessary and sufficient conditions for exponential stability of the iP closed loop, in closed form, in terms of the controller parameters KP and alpha, the sampling period h, and the plant parameters. It then shows that, when the iP parameters are held fixed and the sampling period tends to zero, the closed-loop decay rate tends to the iP gain KP, provided that KP is positive and that the ratio rho between the input gain of the plant and alpha satisfies 0 < rho < 2. One closed-loop pole then behaves as 1 - h KP, while the other tends to 1 - rho. With fixed PI gains, by contrast, the decay rate tends to that of the continuous-time PI loop, which depends on the plant parameters. The two parametrizations therefore suggest different tuning procedures, although they achieve the same closed loops at every fixed sampling period. High gain for the PI is, in some sense, replaced by fast sampling of the iP. The results also make explicit which plant information the iP controller requires: the sign of the input gain and a bound on its magnitude in the limit of fast sampling, and bounds on both plant parameters at a given sampling period. Numerical experiments illustrate these results.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13153PreviousControl Barrier Functions for Counting Tasks in Multi-Agent SystemsNextRisk-Aware Dynamic Operating Envelopes for Battery Arbitrage in Unbalanced Distribution Networks
Related posts
Singapore Airlines elevates travel & work with OpenAI technology
0OpenAI Blog
How to Plan a Five-Slide Social Carousel with One Consistent Character
0dev.to

Kimi K2.5 to K3.1 Pro: 8 API Models, One Enterprise Task, and What Actually Got Done
0dev.to
Visa tested 22 shopping agents. 43% failed - and half of those bought anyway. Here's what actually stops it.
0dev.to
Building WUUUH: Skills Drift Faster Than Confidence — Keeping a Hand In During a Career Gap, What Worked, What Broke
0dev.to
FDR-Controlled Variable Selection for Generalized Linear Models and Cox Regression with Virtual Dummies
0arXiv eess.SP