Backend
MV-IVF: Multi-Vector Retrieval via Multi-Vector Clustering
arXiv cs.IR0 views
arXiv:2611.09040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-vector retrieval represents each query and document as a set of embeddings and scores relevance via fine-grained set-to-set interactions such as MaxSim (Chamfer similarity). This expressiveness improves retrieval quality over single-vector representations, but makes search substantially more expensive. Existing systems address this challenge primarily through proxy representations or filter-and-rerank pipelines that reduce candidate generation to single-vector search. We study the complementary direction of building a native IVF-style index directly over multi-vector data. We introduce MV-IVF, an inverted-file index for multi-vector retrieval built on MV-Lloyd, a new Lloyd-style algorithm for clustering point clouds under a Chamfer objective. Our key observation is that once point clouds are assigned to clusters, the center-update step reduces to standard single-vector clustering over the flattened embeddings in each cluster. This enables efficient construction of a hierarchical IVF tree with center point clouds at internal nodes. At query time, MV-IVF performs best-first beam search over the tree to identify promising leaf clusters, then scores the documents in those leaves. We further accelerate search using low-bit quantization, query compression, and cache-efficient batched search. We implement MV-IVF in MVSIC, an optimized C++ library and unified evaluation framework for multi-vector retrieval that includes several major approaches. Across BEIR and LoTTE text retrieval benchmarks, MV-IVF achieves strong latency--recall tradeoffs, the best batched throughput frontiers, and favorable build-time and index-size profiles. At $90\%$ Recall-$10$@$10$, MV-IVF achieves up to $8.03\times$ lower single-query latency and up to $173.5\times$ higher QPS than the baselines, demonstrating that native IVF-style indexing is practical and effective for scalable multi-vector retrieval.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09040PreviousRethinking Latent Reasoning for Generative Recommendation: Beyond Teacher-Generated CoT and Recurrent Hidden-State FeedbackNextPAGSL: Path-Augmenting Graph Structure Learning for explainable scholar recommendation
Related posts
AI가 단일세포 데이터를 읽는 시대, 우리는 분자 3D 구조를 '읽고' 있는가? 10x Genomics가 Anthropic의 Claude를 Chromium...
0dev.to Data
Wenn ein Drittel der Diagnosen falsch war: Was molekulare Präzision für Allergologie und Arzneimittelforschung bedeutet
0dev.to Data
Planning a Tattoo Idea Before the First Appointment
0dev.to Design

Comment la vectorisation d'image transforme-t-elle un logo PNG en SVG ?
0dev.to Design
I Had the Studio Before I Had the Business Idea
0dev.to Design

Best AI Humanizer for Essays and Academic Writing in 2026: Improve Clarity and Natural Writing
0dev.to Discuss