AI & ML
Cross-Embodiment Motion Planning by Coupling Body-Agnostic World Model with Differentiable Ego-Dynamics
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2610.41330v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Motion planning in clutter is embodiment-specific: the feasible free space and reachable commands depend on each robot's geometry and dynamics. Existing cross-embodiment policies output normalized commands that disregard these differences, or compensate through per-robot training and distillation. World models can in principle pool cross-embodiment data, yet command-conditioned models bind their latent dynamics to a single action space, while pose-conditioned models omit the mapping from commands to body-specific motion. On flat ground, however, embodiment affects the planner's observations only through the camera ego-motion. This letter proposes Hourglass, an hourglass-shaped architecture that factorizes cross-embodiment motion planning at this interface: a body-agnostic world model and each robot's differentiable ego-dynamics, which map commands to that ego-motion, are coupled only through it. The world model is trained on data pooled across embodiments and camera mounts; each robot's ego-dynamics is a reduced-order template with identified physical parameters. A generalist parameter-conditioned policy is learned once at this junction: each imagined step rolls out the template and then the world model, and imagination training through each robot's template makes the policy body-aware. On seven simulated robots of five locomotion types, the generalist policy outperforms imitation-learning and diffusion-policy baselines on the same world model by 3.8--10.6 percentage points in success rate and matches per-robot specialists without dedicated training, while approaching its parameter-conditioned MPPI teacher within 1.4--2.8 points without an online map. After three minutes of teleoperated driving for identification, the synthetic-data-trained model transfers zero-shot to a real skid-steer robot unseen in training, navigating unseen indoor scenes.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41330PreviousLearning from Physical Experience:Context-Space Adaptation for Robotic ManipulationNextHIPC: Humanoid Iterative Planning and Control via Goal-Conditioned Motion Closure
Related posts
Why Senior Engineers Are Mostly Professional Code Deleters
0dev.to

AWS Puts the Region Inside the AS Path on Direct Connect
0dev.to AWS
How Much Does an OTT Platform Really Cost? Start With Two Budgets
0dev.to WebDev

Real Estate API MCP: One Dubai Property Search Costs an AI Agent 17,000 Tokens
0dev.to Python
Inter-AI Morality: How AI Systems Treat One Another [pdf]
0Hacker News New
Solar plane soars to 47,600 ft, on target to fly 100 hours
0Hacker News New