AI & ML
FASTFUNNELS: Agile Multi Robot Navigation in Narrow Spaces via Adaptive Dynamic Funnels
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2611.09005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We focus on the problem of high-speed multi-robot navigation in cluttered spaces with tight spatial constraints. A key challenge is balancing safety with agility, as existing methods often trade one for the other (slowing down near a bottleneck to avoid collisions versus failing to swerve in time at high speeds), especially for car-like systems. Our approach belongs to the family of formation control methods, in which Ackermann-steering agents coordinate while navigating tight spaces. However, current formation control techniques rely on rigid, pre-defined shapes and transitions that depend on initial conditions, the environment, and vehicle dynamics, and are impractical to maintain at high speeds. For example, agents passing through a small gap must first form a square, transform into a line using analytical equations, and then return to a square. In contrast, our approach is inspired by a droplet of water that continuously adapts its shape to the space it flows through without slowing down. We propose a hierarchical algorithm in which, at the high level, a reinforcement learning policy produces a dynamic, blob-like elliptical patch that morphs its shape in real time, squeezing, stretching, and orienting itself around obstacles and through tight spaces. At the low level, the robots are controlled via distributed model predictive control (DMPC) to stay inside the patch, which acts as a soft forcing function, while avoiding collisions with each other. We evaluate our approach, FastFunnels, on simulated F1TENTH racing cars across 14 scenarios with N=1 to N=6 robots, averaged over 20 trials each. FastFunnels achieves an 89% completion rate at 7.73 m/s, while all baselines either fail to complete the track or succeed only at very low speeds (0.07-1.79 m/s, about 40% completion rate).
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09005PreviousVLA Handover: Failure-Prediction-Based Switching from On-Robot to Server VLA ModelsNextA Controlled Study of Models, Skills, Feedback, and Curriculum in Agentic Robotics
Related posts

Pomera’s sleek distraction-free writing machine is just too small
0The Verge
Grep your tool surface before you write another refusal eval
0dev.to
What a 70% vs 90% prompt cache hit rate does to an AI agent’s bill (72 models priced)
0dev.to

How I Tested Hindsight Memory Without Fooling Myself
0dev.to
Do Top-Ranked Local Businesses Get Recommended by ChatGPT? The November 9, 2026 Re-Check: 0 of 3
0dev.to AI
How to Buy ChatGPT Plus Cheap Without Getting Burned — Top-Ups, Pre-Made Accounts, and CDKs Explained
0dev.to AI