AI & ML
Online Budget Allocation with Censored Semi-Bandit Feedback
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2508.05844v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study a stochastic budget-allocation problem over $K$ tasks. At each round $t$, the learner chooses an allocation $X_t \in \Delta_K$. Task $k$ succeeds with probability $F_k(X_{t,k})$, where $F_1,\dots,F_K$ are nondecreasing budget-to-success curves, and upon success yields a random reward with unknown mean $\mu_k$. The learner observes which tasks succeed, and observes a task's reward only upon success (censored semi-bandit feedback). This model captures, for instance, splitting payments across crowdsourcing workers or distributing bids across simultaneous auctions, and subsumes stochastic multi-armed bandits and semi-bandits. We design an optimism-based algorithm that operates under censored semi-bandit feedback and assumes access to an exact maximization oracle. Our main result is an instance-dependent bound showing that in diminishing-returns regimes, the regret of this algorithm scales polylogarithmically with the horizon $T$ without any ad hoc tuning. For general nondecreasing curves, we prove that the same algorithm (with the same tuning) achieves a worst-case regret upper bound of $\tilde O(K\sqrt{T})$. Finally, we establish a matching worst-case regret lower bound of $\Omega(K\sqrt{T})$ that holds even for full-feedback algorithms, highlighting the intrinsic hardness of our problem outside diminishing returns.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05844PreviousImplicit Regularization via Spectral Neural Networks and Non-linear Matrix SensingNextGreedy Alignment Principle for Optimizer Hyperparameter Selection
Related posts
I use AI to draft software docs
0Hacker News New
AI Bicep Heart
0Hacker News New
ChatGPT Image 2.6
0Hacker News New
AML Cycle 2: Do agent memory rankings hold across tracks?
0Hacker News New
Peer Learning Between Agents in a Multi-Agent Team
0Hacker News New
Britain to make salary disclosure in job ads mandatory
0Hacker News New