AI & ML
Prediction Inference for Hybrid Models on Realized Volatility Forecasting
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2611.13212v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: GARCH-LSTM hybrid models have become increasingly popular in the volatility forecasting literature. To date, these models have almost exclusively focused on point estimation and accuracy measures such as RMSE and MAPE, while failing to assess the uncertainty of these point estimates. We approach this gap in two ways. First, we extend the existing GARCH-LSTM model by modeling the conditional mean with an ARMA structure. Second, we develop a forward bootstrap algorithm to build multi-step-ahead prediction intervals for future realized volatility. In order to address the notorious undercoverage of prediction intervals, we implement two solutions. One draws bootstrap innovations from the empirical residual distribution to mimic the fat-tail property of financial series. The other utilizes principles from conformal prediction to systematically extend the prediction interval length. We evaluate the methods in simulations with heavy-tailed and time-varying GARCH processes and in rolling-window forecasts of four U.S. stock indices from 2020 to 2025. The ARMA-based hybrid gives the lowest point-forecast errors in most settings, and combining both remedies with the mean-based hybrid yields intervals closest to the nominal level among competing methods.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13212PreviousPredictive Surprise as Self-Grounding Concept Bottleneck for Interpretable Time SeriesNextSettling the Burn-in Gap: Sharp Risk Bounds for Tail-Averaged SGD in Linear Regression
Related posts
Voice layer for any website – does it worth?
0Hacker News New
Brazil's AI Development Strategy Needs an Edge Layer – TechPolicy.Press
0Hacker News New
Generative AI and the temporary upskilling of knowledge workers
0Hacker News New
Anthropic Unveils Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets, and Claude Data
0Hacker News New
AI Cracks a Quantum Computing Bottleneck
0Hacker News New
Jack and Jill Cut Candidate Screening Costs by 88% with Jev
0Hacker News New