Backend
Regulating Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Operators with Fixed and Adaptive Penalties: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach
arXiv cs.MA0 views
arXiv:2611.07122v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Profit-maximizing Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand (AMoD) operators may exploit consumer surplus through excessive prices and underserve less profitable regions by relocating vehicles away from them. We study how penalty-based regulation of an AMoD operator in a multimodal mobility system can limit surge pricing and improve regional service availability. We model regulation as an outer control loop that acts on a learning-based operator. Static regulation with fixed penalties is formulated as a Markov Decision Process for an operator that jointly controls pricing and rebalancing, and dynamic regulation as a Partially Observable Stochastic Game in which a regulator periodically adjusts region-specific penalties in closed loop. Operator and regulator policies are learned with graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning. In experiments with real-world Manhattan data, fixed surge pricing penalties reduce the share of travelers facing excessive prices from 22% to 1%. For regional service availability, dynamic regulation improves the regulator's reward by up to 15.6% over fixed penalties of equal mean intensity. The gains in service availability are strongest when spare fleet capacity exists, whereas service deficits persist in peak periods with highly utilized fleets. The learned regulator policy responds by reducing penalties where limited fleet capacity restricts compliance. The results identify trade-offs between regulatory targets, operator profitability, and traveler utility.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07122PreviousPolynomial-Time Computation of Extensive-Form Proper Equilibria in Two-Player Zero-Sum GamesNextThe Last Mile to the Real World: Agent-Native Primitives as Reusable Building Blocks for Solving Real-World Tasks
Related posts
Executable but Unfaithful: Mock Object, Stub, and Assertion Generation by LLMs and Coding Agents
0arXiv cs.SE
SaltBench: A Referee-Gated Protocol for Measuring Method Effects in Machine-Checked Software Work
0arXiv cs.SE
QDiff: Differential Testing of Quantum Software Stacks
0arXiv cs.SE
Don't Prompt Your Agents. Equip Them: Skillware as a Modular Standard for Sovereign, Auditable, and Deterministic Capability Execution for Logical Systems
0arXiv cs.SE
Follow the Policy, Fail the Benchmark: Auditing and Revising Policy-Based Decision Benchmarks
0arXiv cs.SE
Accepted but Wrong: Silent Failures of LLM Code Repairs after API Migrations
0arXiv cs.SE