AI & ML
TacO: Benchmarking Tactile Sensors for Object Manipulation
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2605.21976v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-based learning from demonstrations has achieved remarkable success in enabling robots to perform manipulation tasks and high-level semantic reasoning, yet it remains insufficient for complex, contact-rich manipulation. While there is broad agreement that tactile sensing improves manipulation, there is no empirical guidance on which tactile sensors are best suited for which manipulation tasks. In this paper, we provide a systematic, task-driven evaluation of tactile sensors for robot manipulation and propose a framework for selecting and evaluating sensors based on manipulation policy performance. Separate manipulation policies are trained for tactile sensors of four distinct modalities: visual, acoustic, magnetic, and resistive, across three tasks: pick-and-place with unknown mass, object reorientation, and plug insertion. For each task, we analyze how sensor properties, including spatial resolution, shear sensing, tactile representation, and inherent material friction, affect task performance. Rather than tactile sensing being universally beneficial in the same way, our results show that the usefulness of tactile information depends strongly on sensor modality, material properties, and the specific manipulation tasks. The tactile sensors, code, data, and hardware setup will be publicly available on the project website.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21976PreviousSemantically Adaptive Control Barrier Functions with Vision-Language Models for Real-Time Robot NavigationNextNDPP-Grasp: Non-Differentiable Physical Plausibility Constraint-Guided Task-Oriented Dexterous Grasp Generation
Related posts
Lavoro su piattaforma e algoritmi: cosa cambia con la direttiva europea per chi progetta il software
0dev.to
LifeVal Benchmark Targets Everyday Personal Assistant Tasks Shaped by ChatGPT User Feedback
0dev.to
Oracle files to sell $20B in new stock, bonds to finance AI buildout
0Hacker News
7.9% to 48.1%: LLM rewrote Qwen weights, no training
0dev.to
Spousal Open Work Permits in Canada: Who Qualifies in 2026 and What to Prepare
0dev.to
Reading ingredient lists from phone photos: a crop bug, a model bench, and why the AI never gives the verdict
0dev.to