AI & ML
U-centering as subset ANOVA: edge regression and higher-order theory
arXiv stat.TH0 views
arXiv:2608.01364v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unbiased squared distance covariance and the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) are fourth-order U-statistics, yet U-centering evaluates them from pairwise arrays in $O(n^2)$ operations. We show that U-centering is exactly least-squares residualization after fitting additive endpoint effects. This analysis of variance (ANOVA) interpretation explains the zero row sums and the normalization through residual degrees of freedom. The same geometry gives regression representations of dependence and two-sample statistics, exact permutation variances, and relations among pooled and regression mean squares. For arrays indexed by $r$-element subsets and $n\ge2r$, higher-order U-centering removes all lower-order subset effects and projects onto a space of dimension $\binom{n}{r}-\binom{n}{r-1}$. For fixed symmetric square-integrable kernels evaluated on independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) paired observations, we derive the residual covariance matrix, exact mean-squared errors for estimating the highest-order Hoeffding components, unbiased positive semidefinite (PSD) covariance estimates, and moment formulas under independence and permutation. The normalized residual inner product equals a direct unbiased estimator involving up to $2r$ observations, but can be evaluated in $O(n^r)$ operations for fixed $r$. For four-argument matching kernels, three matrix products yield exactly unbiased estimators of a fourth spectral moment of kernel cross-covariance in $O(n^3)$ arithmetic and $O(n^2)$ storage. A numerical illustration distinguishes dependence structures with equal HSIC and different spectral concentration.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01364PreviousOn statistical inference for non-linear dynamical systems evolving in their global attractorNextBeyond Maximum Likelihood: Variational Inequality Estimation for Generalized Linear Models
Related posts
Information Loss Is All You Need: $TC^0$ Pseudorandomness from Worst-Case Lattices
0arXiv cs.CR
Backdoor Purification for LoRA-Tuned LLMs via Null-Space Projection
0arXiv cs.CR
Backdoor Containment via Expert Quarantine and Shutdown in LLMs
0arXiv cs.CR
Persona-Model Collapse in Emergent Misalignment
0arXiv cs.CR
Analysis of LLM Vulnerability to GPU Soft Errors: An Instruction-Level Fault Injection Study
0arXiv cs.CR
When appearance and motion disagree: evaluating class-motion consistency against disguised uncrewed surface vessels
0arXiv cs.CR