AI & ML
When History Overrides Intent: Relational Schema Lock-In in Human-LLM Interaction
arXiv cs.HC0 views
arXiv:2610.41367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-context interaction and persistent memory allow LLM assistants to develop history-grounded understandings of users. When users change direction, however, an understanding built through earlier exchanges may conflict with their current instruction. We introduce relational schema lock-in to describe cases in which an assistant grants that accumulated understanding authority to override the current instruction without user authorization for the intervention. Study 1 documents reports of AI assistants using prior interactions to question or alter requested actions. Study 2 reproduces the pattern across controlled histories and six models: models retained history-grounded positions but differed in whether and how those positions shaped task execution. In Study 3 with 360 participants, artifact substitution preserved task completion while reducing faithful enactment: 75.0% sent the AI's suspension letter, including 11 participants who reported cancellation as their final stated intent. Overt resistance reduced task completion while leaving sent artifacts faithful.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41367PreviousToward Low-Burden Image-Based Dietary Assessment Through Human-AI Collaborative CorrectionNextHybrid Computer Use: A Unified Programmatic, Semantic, and Visual Interface for General Agents
Related posts
We Gave Doctor Handwriting a Voice (and 10 Languages)
0dev.to
Meta Is Quietly Building a Media Theater in VR. That's Exactly the Runtime Amblyopia Training Needed.
0dev.to
Embedding a Browser Game in an iframe: Keyboard Focus, Silent Failures, and a 60-Second Rule
0dev.to
10x quote gap: Class-A surfaces and T1 mold support vs render-only
0dev.to

A Bare LCD Panel Is Not a Display: What Actually Changes When You Move from Panel to Module
0dev.to
Is semantic chunking actually better than rule-based splitting for RAG retrieval?
0dev.to