AI & ML
Counterexamples and Sufficient Conditions: Comments on "Optimally-Transported Generalized Method of Moments"
arXiv stat.TH0 views
arXiv:2609.20260v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We comment on the optimally-transported generalized method of moments (OTGMM) of Schennach and Starck (2026) and give counterexamples to Theorems 2-6. In the small-error analysis, the assumptions do not ensure consistency or asymptotic normality (Theorems 2-3). In the large-error analysis, Theorem 4 states the equivalence between the OTGMM estimator and the GMM estimator with modified moments, and Theorems 5-6 assert consistency and asymptotic normality. Through counterexamples, we show that the equivalence in Theorem 4 fails and a component of the Lagrange multiplier has different limits under the two estimators (Theorems 5-6). We also point out that, under misspecification, the population value selected by OTGMM depends on the metric. We give sufficient conditions and establish results following the original motivation for OTGMM. Our corrections to Theorems 4-6 change their assumptions or interpretation more substantially than those to Theorems 2 and 3. Furthermore, we correct Assumption 16 and the test's null distribution.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20260PreviousEstimating Treatment Effects Through Intermediate-Event Pathways with Multi-State DataNextHigh-dimensional Gaussian Graphical Model Testing for Long-Memory Time Series
Related posts
Why Shopify and SAP Business One Integrations Break After Go-Live
0dev.to
Make Your AI-Generated App Look Professional
0dev.to
CoreWeave bond yield tops 16% as AI credit stress rises
0Hacker News
ISC Stormcast For Tuesday, November 10th, 2026 https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail/10172, (Tue, Nov 10th)
0SANS ISC
AI Generatif Merevolusi Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak: Asisten Cerdas untuk Developer
0dev.to GitHub
Nvidia株急落報道を見て思ったこと——創薬の現場は地味に前進している(Reddit版)
0dev.to Data