AI & ML
Hierarchical Incremental Beta Splatting for Online Reconstruction
arXiv cs.GR0 views
arXiv:2611.08288v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Online 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstructs a scene during capture: each keyframe spawns primitives once and refines them for only a few dozen iterations, leaving little chance to fix poor initialization or missing detail. Gaussians are also inherently soft, needing many overlaps for solid surfaces. We present Hierarchical Incremental Beta Splatting (HIBS), which brings beta kernels to incremental reconstruction. Their shape parameter interpolates between a soft, Gaussian-like profile and a flat-topped, near-opaque surfel, acting as a confidence dial for geometry. Our confidence-aware spawning uses geometric observability and multi-view depth agreement to initialize both opacity and shape, producing solid primitives where geometry is verifiable and soft, correctable primitives where it is not. As online densification, error-driven relocation recycles stale primitives into photometric-error hotspots. Bounded beta kernel support enables exact tile culling and faster rasterization, and a closed-form, shape-preserving merging formulation provides a level-of-detail (LOD) hierarchy for fast optimization and real-time rendering. On Mip-NeRF 360 in the on-the-fly protocol, HIBS improves PSNR by up to 0.8 dB while reducing optimization time by up to 40%. Project page: https://linus-franke.com/hibs/
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08288PreviousStructure from Collision via Hypothesis-Space ReasoningNextOmniFaceRig: Fully Automatic Inner-Mouth-Aware Face Rigging Across Diverse 3D Character Topologies
Related posts
How much of your website traffic is actually human?
0dev.to
Google's Elephant-Goldfish plugin: 5 stages of fresh-context review before your agent writes code, and 3 catches
0dev.to
Knowledge Graph Optimization Guide for Businesses
0dev.to
Repairing a corrupt FIT file: what actually breaks and how to rebuild it
0dev.to
Designing Agentic Interfaces Beyond the Chatbot
0HackerNoon

Secure Code Benchmark Finds Top Coding Agents Write Secure Code Only 25% of the Time
0HackerNoon