AI & ML
Large Language Model Explainability for Planning Lunar Rover Trajectories under Uncertainty
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2611.13292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Planning planetary rover trajectories under probabilistic uncertainty is a multi-objective optimization problem that science teams currently iteratively solve and verify by hand. This process becomes impractical when timelines and constraints frequently shift throughout the mission planning phase. Sampling-based planners such as Monte Carlo tree search can speed up this process, but their outputs do not preserve traceability to the science objectives that justify each plan, which the science team needs to verify. We propose an interactive assistant based on a large language model (LLM) that can explain planner trajectories using domain vocabulary and re-run the planner under user-specified conditions to compare alternatives. Previous work has used LLMs inside planner decision-making loops, but we explore using them for post-planning explanation, where they are more likely to be trusted since they do not directly influence planner decisions. Our framework pairs a simulator inspired by the NASA Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) mission with a ReAct queryable interface that calls curated action tools and retrieval functions. We evaluate the assistant on a query bank consisting of plan comparisons, feasibility, and lookup queries. Experiments show that 90.9% of the assistant's responses are faithful to the planner's outputs, a nearly 65% improvement over zero-shot prompting of the same LLM without tool access, demonstrating the potential for trustworthy explainability of uncertainty-aware traverses with an LLM-based system.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13292PreviousRaMOD: Moving-Object Detection from Raw mmWave Radar Cubes under Ego MotionNextDoes Haptic Connection to a Healthy Partner Improve Motor Learning in Chronic Stroke? A Pilot Study of Robot-Based Dyadic Training
Related posts
Answering Conjunctive Queries over Linear Existential Rules with Transitivity
0arXiv cs.DB
How Many Demonstrations Does a VLA Need? On the Sample Efficiency of VLA Finetuning
0arXiv cs.RO
Altitude-Adaptive UAV-to-Map Image Matching for Aerial Geo-Localization
0arXiv cs.RO
OASIS: Optimization-Aware Subgoal Inference with Safety Constraints for Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation
0arXiv cs.RO
Fade to... Red? Scheduling Coloured Noise Exploration Supports Efficient Robot Learning with Reduced Movement Jerk
0arXiv cs.RO
DexForesight: Grounding Dexterous Policies with Implicit Spatial Foresight
0arXiv cs.RO