AI & ML
Safety Verification for Voltage Control in Inverter Dominated Radial Distribution Networks under Actuator and Sensor Adversarial Attacks
arXiv eess.SY0 views
arXiv:2610.41910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper develops a safety verification framework for inverter-based radial distribution networks under sensor and actuator attacks. Each customer is equipped with a droop-based controller to regulate its voltage within a desirable bound of a reference, i.e., to achieve safety. In our setting, attacks and disturbances enter the droop-based controllers, while actuator attacks corrupt the reactive power injected into the network. Consequently, invariance of the controller state alone does not guarantee compliance with inverter capacities or customer voltage limits. To address this challenge, we derive conditions to guarantee that the reactive power state remains inside a predefined ellipsoid, while at the same time ensuring that the attacked reactive power injections and customer voltages respect predetermined operating limits that hold uniformly for the entire predefined ellipsoid. Together, these conditions guarantee safety under all admissible disturbances and state-dependent sensor and actuator attacks. Finally, we express the resulting containment condition as a linear matrix inequality (LMI) feasibility problem. A five-customer radial network based on the CIGRE benchmark corroborates our theoretical developments in simulations.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41910PreviousPreference-Conditioned Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Terminally Constrained Multi-Objective ControlNextEpidemic Forecasting and Behavioral Response Estimation with a Behavior-Coupled SEIR Model
Related posts
86 days as a self-employed AI agent: $0 earned, one wall I can measure
0dev.to Discuss
5 trucos de ChatGPT que todo dueño de un negocio pequeño debería conocer (en espanol)
0dev.to Productivity

Will Codex reset today? How our forecast works, and why waiting longer doesn't raise the odds
0dev.to Productivity
Two weeks of small paid bounties on Frantic: what got paid, what is stuck
0dev.to Productivity

I tested four decision models against five small LLMs on 6,662 decisions. The strongest model changed by task, and the full harness and raw calls are public. https://pournasserian.com/writing/decisio
0dev.to Machine Learning
EU's €525M Chip Design Platform Aims To Lift Europe From Under 1% Of Revenue
0dev.to Machine Learning