AI & ML
Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2505.23814v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Watermarking has emerged as a leading technical proposal for attributing generative AI content and is increasingly cited in global governance frameworks. This position paper argues that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight. We identify a growing gap between regulatory expectations and the technical limitations of existing watermarking schemes. Through analysis of policy proposals and industry practices, we show how incentive structures disincentivize robust, auditable deployments. To realign watermarking with governance goals, we propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms. Without enforceable requirements and independent verification, watermarking will remain inadequate for accountability and ultimately undermine broader efforts in AI safety and regulation.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23814PreviousfaulTPM: Exposing AMD fTPMs' Deepest SecretsNextCryptanalysis of Isogeny-Based Quantum Money with Rational Points
Related posts
I Built a Support Room Where the AI Drafts and a Human Decides
0dev.to
An AI poller cost us almost 27 USD in one day: the 40-line spend guard we added
0dev.to

An AI agent built a Godot game. Then it checked its work.
0dev.to
Make a price cleaner reject formats it does not understand
0dev.to

How a Silent Fallback Corrupted My Hindsight Experiment
0dev.to
Une IA modifie 0,016 % des poids d’un modèle : ce que montre l’expérience
0dev.to