Backend
A Cross-Layered Multi-Drone Coordination for Medical Supply Delivery during Disaster Response Management
arXiv cs.MA0 views
arXiv:2605.09342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous drone fleets have potential in medical supply delivery during disaster incident response. However, coordinating multiple drones in such settings introduces compounding challenges: dynamic hazards such as wind, obstacles, and intermittent connectivity, constrained energy budgets, and the need to serve patients fairly under strict deadlines and triage-based priority. We present CEDA, a Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) Double Deep Q-Network algorithm augmented with a QMIX-style monotonic mixing network for cooperative multi-drone medical delivery, designed to jointly optimize triage-aware routing, multi-agent coordination, and energy-efficient navigation under dynamic uncertainty. CEDA introduces a Priority-Preserving Fair Scheduling strategy, in which a structured reward function encodes triage priority weights, outcome-level fairness and priority-ordering rewards, and complementary shaping mechanisms that discourage systematic starvation. We evaluate CEDA in a simulated grid environment with five drones serving up to fifty patients, featuring dynamic hazard zones, stochastic action failures, and dynamically spawning patients across three triage levels, and in PX4 software-in-the-loop (SITL) validation using five X500 quadrotors controlled via MAVSDK. Simulation results show that CEDA delivers over 95\% of spawned patients, reduces obstacle collisions by over 95\% across training, and achieves a weighted triage efficiency exceeding 0.90 alongside a Jain's Fairness Index of approximately 1.0 across triage classes. CEDA preserves clinical priority ordering, with Critical patients receiving the fastest response times, while achieving low and comparable mortality across all triage classes. PX4 SITL validation further shows that the learned policy retains its triage-aware behavior under continuous simulated flight and delayed-action conditions.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09342PreviousStrategic Tanking in Stable Matching MarketsNextEvents as Triggers for Behavioral Diversity in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Related posts
Inference on Infernet is pay as you go, and the price follows the market
0dev.to AI
How to Use AI in Sales | How AI Can Help Sales Teams
0dev.to AI

Stop building agents like it's a demo: security lessons from yet another Gmail assistant on Strands Agents and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
0dev.to AWS

The AI-Built Website Looks Fine—Why Can't Google Find It? SEO Settings You Must Check Before Launch
0dev.to WebDev
Does My Business Need a Client Portal?
0dev.to WebDev

WordPress Website Design Checklist: 10 Things Developers Should Review Before Launch
0dev.to WebDev