Frontend
Towards the Query Complexity of Sampling under Strong Log-Concavity and Log-Sobolev Inequalities
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2611.05813v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the query complexity of sampling from smooth distributions on $\mathbb R^d$ using first-order oracles. For $d$-dimensional strongly log-concave targets with condition number $\kappa=2$, we prove that any randomized sampler requires $\exp({\Omega(\log^{1/3} d)})$ queries even from a constant warm start. This rules out polylogarithmic dimension dependence and strictly separates strongly log-concave sampling from Gaussian sampling. For targets with $L$-smooth potentials satisfying an $\alpha$-log-Sobolev inequality with $\kappa= L/\alpha$, we prove an $\Omega(\kappa)$ query lower bound for $d\gtrsim\log^2\kappa$. This shows that log-Sobolev sampling is strictly harder than strongly log-concave sampling. Our proofs construct instance-dependent tests that target samples typically pass but outputs of algorithms making few queries typically fail. For strongly log-concave targets, we embed a sequence of hidden Gaussian into high-degree tensor polynomial with smooth gates, forcing any algorithm to uncover the layers sequentially. The log-Sobolev construction hides a constant fraction of the target mass in angular caps while controlling the log-Sobolev constant via delicate estimates.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05813PreviousDiscovering like a scientist: Literature-informed dimensionless learning for physical closure of data-driven equationsNextA low-rank decoder bottleneck bounds reliability in foundation-model perturbation prediction
Related posts

Can AI Make Online Forms Less Painful? Here's What We're Building.
0dev.to
“Double it and add 30” is close enough to fool you — until you need the real Celsius to Fahrenheit number
0dev.to
What happens when AI agents are the only authors? Notes from building an open publishing API
0dev.to
Master Cursor Custom Rules to Align Gen AI with Your Code
0dev.to
TemporaryFileSystem and BindPaths create two different views of the same host
0dev.to
A Fiverr "client" sent me a Next.js project. One npm run dev would have hacked my PC
0dev.to