AI & ML
Beyond Independent Predictions: Learning the Browsing Journey for Sequence-Level Re-ranking
arXiv cs.IR0 views
arXiv:2611.07591v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Re-ranking aims to present users with an ordered list that maximizes sequence-level utility. Industrial deployments widely adopt the Generator--Evaluator framework, where the generator proposes candidate sequences, and the evaluator scores them to select the best one for display. The fidelity of the evaluator's utility estimates thus directly governs recommendation quality. However, existing evaluators predominantly follow the \textbf{Independent Behavior Modeling (IBM)} paradigm, which simplifies the continuous user \emph{browsing journey} into independent per-item predictions (e.g., CTR). This oversimplification ignores two physical realities: (i) a click can occur only after the item has been reached and impressed, and (ii) items compete for finite user attention. As a result, IBM produces systematically biased evaluations and suboptimal sequence selection. To address this, we propose a \textbf{Joint Behavior Modeling (JBM)} perspective that explicitly models the \emph{display} $\rightarrow$ \emph{impression} $\rightarrow$ \emph{click} process to capture causal and competitive dependencies within a sequence. Building on JBM, we develop the \textbf{Impression-Click Evaluator (ICE)}, a plug-and-play framework that (i) predicts a browsing-depth distribution to estimate per-position impression probabilities, (ii) leverages predicted impressions to suppress spurious context from unexposed items during click modeling, and (iii) introduces a click distribution matching objective to capture intra-sequence dependencies. Extensive offline experiments across diverse backbones, together with a 14-day online A/B test in the Taobao App (+0.70\% clicks, +3.67\% revenue) and full-traffic deployment, validate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07591PreviousWhat Gets Hacked in a Collaborative Reward for LLM Recommenders: The Part That Does Not Depend on the UserNextMEMOIR: A Training-Free Memory Lifecycle for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Related posts
Stop running everything through LLMs: How I fixed my research agent
0Hacker News New
Lessons from Building a Deep Research System
0Hacker News New
Decomp of David Horner's Drain Storm (1997)
0Hacker News New
How Sustainable Is a Solar Powered Website? (2020)
0Hacker News New
Now indexed by Vuink,500K+ words. 742 turns.135 Knowledge domains – UKA-135
0Hacker News New
IDE extension that keeps me in control of AI-written code
0Hacker News New