AI & ML
What Gets Hacked in a Collaborative Reward for LLM Recommenders: The Part That Does Not Depend on the User
arXiv cs.IR0 views
arXiv:2611.07588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Collaborative-filtering (CF) scores provide graded, personalized rewards for training large language model (LLM) recommenders through reinforcement learning. However, these rewards can cause exposure collapse: even though the CF model itself produces diverse top recommendations across users, an LLM optimized with its rewards concentrates on fewer items. We decompose each score into an item-mean component, the item's average CF score across user histories, and a residual component, the current user's score deviation from the average. Through controlled interventions, we identify the item-mean component as a contributor to exposure collapse. Accordingly, we propose two reward corrections: per-item centering removes each item's estimated mean score, while per-item standardization further rescales the residual using its estimated standard deviation. Experiments on two datasets with two identifier schemes show that both corrections substantially improve catalog coverage and exposure evenness. Compared with training on the uncorrected CF reward, our corrections increase the number of distinct items ranked first across users by up to $9.8\times$, while maintaining comparable ranking accuracy. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLM4Rec-CF-Bias-27EF/.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07588PreviousOptST: Optimizing Semantic Tokenization for LLM-Enhanced RecommendationNextBeyond Independent Predictions: Learning the Browsing Journey for Sequence-Level Re-ranking
Related posts
Social Preview Card Maker in the Browser: Canvas Sizes, Contrast and PNG vs SVG
0dev.to WebDev

The agent that wouldn't delete my email
0dev.to Security

Package Delivery Scams: How to Spot Fake USPS and Royal Mail Texts
0dev.to Security
You can now install an OS in seven seconds. Is your team aiming high enough?
0dev.to Linux
क्या सिमैंटिक कोड सर्च असली रिपॉज़िटरी पर सच में grep से बेहतर है?
0dev.to Python

Set up model-radar: catch free LLMs that really make tool calls
0dev.to Python